The image contains the following text:
in a friend or relative by remembering these occasions if
only by a card or a telephone call. Human relations are
built around a structural framework of philanthropy,
sympathy, honesty, and helpfulness, but the single bricks
which give the house of friendship its unique facade are
cemented by trivial favours and inconsequential affirma¬
tions of regard.
A patient once came to my office crying bitterly because
her husband had neglected her on her birthday. The
husband had, she admitted, handed her a package con¬
taining ,£20,000 worth of stock in his company, but he
had neglected to send her the yellow roses which had
always been the sign of his love and affection on previous
anniversaries. Objectively we may agree with the husband
that her demands were somewhat unreasonable, in the
light of his more valuable gift, but we know that many
marriages go on the rocks of unhappiness just because a
husband or a wife neglects the little things that count.
The Fine Art of Making Presents
This brings* us to the very practical consideration of
gifts. There are two kinds of gifts. You either give
something you like and value highly, or you go out of
vour way to give something that will be valuable to the
person you desire to honour. Many people choose the
former, or projective type of giving, which includes that
useless prostitution of giving, the giving of gifts for
reasons of duty, custom, or the like. This is the easiest
and the worst—way to make a present. When you give
a small boy who is aching to have a new tennis racket, a
copy of Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations because of some
vague hope that it may do him good, you practise a sub¬
jective-projective giving. You might just as well never
give anything as make an inappropriate, casual, or
inconsidered gift. The only proper giving is giving which
represents the donor’s active identification with the
presentee’s pattern of life. Such empathy takes more
time, but it enriches both him who gives and him who