The image contains the following text:
age of thirty-five an aggressive, active, worldly woman,
was entirely different from her husband’s. At the age of
six she was thrown into the surf at a seaside resort, and
swam out. She could not remember a day of illness
during her entire childhood. Both her mother and father
were active sportsmen and very courageous social
individuals. The family ideal was the ideal of good
sportsmanship. The harder the obstacle, the more fun
in overcoming it. Thus Mrs. Adams was trained to a
courageous, socially adjusted “ motor ” type of living.
Her greatest happiness has always been in finding a
worthy opponent and fighting hard to win. Defeats
were never to be taken seriously—one must be a good
sport, try hard the next time, and never mind if one
didn’t win. The game was the thing. With this back¬
ground and this goal we can understand why Mrs. Adams
prefers a stiff tennis match to an intellectual bout with
Hegel or Nietzsche, and why she prefers dancing to a
lecture on the ethics of Aristotle.
Good ” and “ Bad ” Characters
We frequently hear our friends saying that Mr. X. has
a “ good ” character or that Mr. Y. is a “ vicious ” man.
The student of human nature must abjure all moral
evaluations of character and personality if he wishes to
understand his fellow-men. It is a general human
tendency to label people and take those labels seriously,
as if they were true interpretations and explanations.
If you wish to understand your neighbour (and there is
no better practice in understanding your own goal, your
own pattern, your own vital formula, and your own
character and personality), try to put yourself in the other
fellow’s place, and by identifying yourself with his actions,
really understand them. A good way to do this is to say
to yourself, “ Under what conditions, and to what end.,
would I be doing exactly the same thing ? ” If you can
reconstruct the man’s goal, you will understand why he