The image contains the following text:
To Faradaize the internal ear, he advises one electrode to be
on the back of the neck, and filling the ear tube with warm
water, then introducing into the water thus filling the exter-
nal ear, the wire tip of the primary or secondary conductor of
an induction machine, and maintaining it in the midst of the
water, while the current flows, but without touching the sides of
the ear passage if possible, nor yet the membrane of the tym-
panum. But this is so difficult to be done, so disagreeable to
the patient, and so ineffectual, that the author has instituted an
entirely different method, by employing an ear electrode of ivory
sponge and silver wire, to convey the galvanic current, instead
of Faradaic current, in this treatment for noises and deafness,
which is more practical, agreeable, and more frequently success-
ful. See page 243.
For Faradaizing in partial amaurosis, loss of taste, and
premature diminution of sight, he advises " the employment
rather of the continuous galvanic current, because it exercises
a very much more remarkable influence on these organs than
can be produced by the induction currents of electro-magnet-
ism." But how does Dr. Duchenne (and other writers who
seem to take all his propositions without question) reconcile
such facts, declared by himself? This is no declaration of
another—no ex parte testimony. A late English writer testi-
fies that he has found the best effects from the use of moderate
galvanic currents in affections of the special senses ; and yet, in
the same work, he cautions against the employment of these same
currents on the large nerves and muscles of the limbs, for fear
of the effects reaching the brain! I cannot account for this
opinion, if given from experience in practice, unless, as in the
former case, — i. e., when using galvanic electricity about the
face, — care was taken to use the smaller intensity, also the occa-
sional, or, perhaps, more frequent interruptions of the current,
as it certainly should be only so employed ; while in the latter
case a stronger inverse current was allowed to traverse a nerve
trunk, or group of muscles, persistently for some indefinite
time, which would almost necessarily do injury rather than good.
To apply any considerable current of galvanism to the nerve
&