The image contains the following text:
electrodes were applied directly to the muscles, both frogs suf-
fered commotions, and it even appeared that the poisoned frog
preserved the property of suffering contraction from the stimu-
lus/or a longer time than the one which had not been poisoned.
This is claimed by some as very conclusive evidence of the actual
existence of an irritability proper of muscles. But M. Eckhard
objected to this conclusion, as it was not quite certain that the
last ramification of the nerves were thus totally paralyzed.
Dr. Althaus says the following experiment satisfies his mind
that the motor nerves, and those only, are first killed by this
poison: He securely ties the crural artery and veins up on
one side of the animal, so that the circulation of the blood in
that limb is stopped. The animal is then poisoned by inserting
a small quantity of woorara under the skin on the body. If,
then, the motor nerves of the animal be tested by galvanism a
short time afterwards, it becomes evident that all the nerves
have lost their integrity, with the exception only of the crural
nerve of that side where the vessels have been tied. This nerve,
however, when galvanized, still sets the muscles in play. But if
the electric stimulus be directed to the muscular substance it-
self, contractions may be obtained in all the muscles of that limb;
and the contractile power of those muscles the nerves of which
have been poisoned will last even longer than those which have
not been so poisoned, in consequence of the stoppage of the
blood circulation. He mentions in this connection, also, some
microscopic observations of Dr. Wundt, which also go to show
the irritability proper of the muscles. He saw that when the
circuit of a galvanic battery was closed, embracing the muscular
tissue that was in the field of the microscope, the fibres were
shortened, and that, after the contraction produced by the com-
mencement of the current had passed off, the fibres were still
shortened ; i. e., they did not immediately regain their previous
length while the current was running, but remained somewhat
shorter for several minutes. If the circuit was then opened
again, there was a difference, in proportion as a contraction was
produced or not. When there was no contraction at the cessa-
tion of the current, the muscular fibres immediately regained