The image contains the following text:
producing an in-working of the current in the fibrils of the
nerves, and, in the ultimate muscle fibres, for increase of excita-
bility. Yet, according to Dr. Remak, we must always make a
rigid distinction between the excitability of a nerve or muscle
and its capability; for these two terms are not, in these con-
nections, the same.
I have never as yet been able to discover any diminution of
susceptibility from the moderate use of this method of using a
current, as to strength, say twenty Danicil's elements, or half
power of induction currents; and as to time of each alternat-
ing, say, for an average, every fifteen to thirty seconds ; and as
to length of seance, say five or ten to fifteen minutes, — so far
as it was shown by pain and prickle, by contractions, and other
sensations. Not only so, but there is usually an increased re-
sponse to the manoeuvres of the electrodes ; for where a motor
nerve is embraced in the current that did not at first show any
muscle twitch, it will, after a very few turns of the current-
changer, respond by strong contractions in its depending muscles,
or in their antagonists. This proves M. Marianini's observation
to be correct, that " the induced opening contraction always indi-
cates an increased preparation for the response to the production
of the opposite current." We also find that this increase of sus-
ceptibility is augmented all the more, the more suddenly that
change in the current is produced.
" The Tetanus of Ritter" — so often quoted,but, after all, seen
only in the dead frog — I believe has never been observed in liv-
ing men ; i. e., after employing the constant current for reme-
dial purposes : nor is any moderate working of a current able to
render either a nerve or muscle not susceptible to the entrance
of the same or the opposite current. But still I believe this
might be produced by an unwarrantable and abusive use of a
very powerful and painful current, repeatedly applied and re-
versed by a metallic current-changer, if persisted in for some
time. So is a guano island desolate ; and when guano is too
powerfully applied to a field or orchard, it is well known that
it kills ; but in that very power, when rationally employed, con-
sists its undeniable fertilizing capabilities.
27