The image contains the following text:
greater degree than before. From such premises, surely, the
author can never concur in the somewhat general opinion, that
any considerable employment of the so-called constant galvanic
current upon the human organism, has necessarily, a paralyzing
effect. That paralysis, as well as a paralyzing tendency, can be
produced by an injudicious use of electric currents, and that
more readily by the galvanic, than the Faradaic currents, the
author concedes. But, because the former has more power and
uniformity of effect, upon and through the large nerve trunks
particularly, is the reason why, when correctly employed, it
is so greatly valued by the author as a therapeutic. In the
most recent and popular work published in England on this
subject, — and it is a most excellent work in many respects,—
it is laid down as true, that " if the continuous galvanic current
is allowed to traverse the spinal cord, then there is produced la
paralyzing- effect,' whatever may be the point to which the poles
are directed." Again: " The inverse continuous current [gal-
vanic] is more powerful for paralyzing- the spinal cord than
even the direct galvanic current." Such, indeed, are the gener-
ally received views. Dr. Duchenne has also, in this direction,
powerfully convinced the medical world, and greatly deterred
from the employment of galvanism ; but such views certainly
do not accord with my own clinical experience, and there-
fore I cannot adopt them.
The anterior roots of the spinal nerves, according to Dr. A.
.Shaw, as should be mentioned here, arise by numerous fine rad-
icles from the very surface of the anterior column, thus appar-
ently showing that the part of the cord from which they derive
the power of motion, is situated superficially. The posterior
roots, on the contrary, dip boldly into the interspace between
the posterior lateral, and posterior columns, and they reach a
deep part of the organ before they subdivide to form any per-
ceptible connection with the spinal cord; in short, the mode of
the origin of the posterior roots is quite different from that of
the anterior, and from their passage so deeply into the interior
it may be inferred that the part of the cord which bestows sen-
sibility is situated deeply. These views throw light on a fact