The image contains the following text:
of less relative tension,) will produce only the least spark.
Now, if these two kinds of electricities, i. e., positive and nega-
tive, be constantly renewed, there will likewise be a continuous
neutralization, either through the air as a fine succession of
sparks, or through a conductor in contact. The essential dif-
ference between a discharge of electricity, and a current of elec-
tricity, as they relate to physiology and therapeutics, will be
plainly delineated in this work. I will only mention here, that
a discharge or shock, although it produces a number of other
powerful effects, has almost no chemical effect and no influence
on the magnetic needle, whilst all currents of electricity are able
to accomplish both.
We find that we can produce electricity instantly and con-
stantly; but the accumulation of electricity is a matter of time.
And here I must remind you of an electric law that is not so
known, or else is more generally forgotten ; and that is, that one
of the electricities by friction is never liberated without the
other or opposite electricity being equally so, and that in the
same proportion. 1 mention this as a particular reminder, be-
cause a provision must for this reason be always made for the
escape (as for instance to the earth) of the electricity we do
not want, in order to obtain freely and largely that other kind
which we do want. This law, first laid down by M. Wilke, ap-
plies also to other forms of electricity, but all the more distinc-
tively in this, where one only of the electricities is collected,
as for instance when highly charging the Leyden jars. True,
Faraday caused two bands of flannel to be rubbed against each
other crosswise, and thus both were rendered negative. But
this is an apparent exception, although it can be explained.
Finally, we are taught that the kind of electricity that is de-
veloped upon a body does not depend solely upon the nature of
this body, but likewise upon that of the substance with which it
is acted upon, or rubbed, as one electricity is never developed
without its opposite; and either of these may prefer to accumu-
late on the one or other body. There is not, therefore, an iden-
tity between the electricity that glass acquires by friction, and
which we call vitreous, and that which wax acquires, and which