How to be happy though human / by W. Béran Wolfe.

341/400

(debug: view other mode)

The image contains the following text:

are the girls whose parents have so convinced them of their special virtues that they can find no man to suit them. They fall in love with far-away heroes of the stage and screen, with married men, with great characters in story¬ books and fairy tales. Theirs is the quest for the ineluctable prince charming. Concessions to reality they never make. In time they become critical and crabbed, and when they are forced into marriage by social con¬ ventions or the necessity of finding someone to provide for them—they cannot work for a living and soil their princess hands—they revenge themselves on the poor man they marry because he fails to come up to their fantastic standards. The man of their choice is a composite of Croesus, Apollo, Adonis, the handy-man from the garage, their favourite brother, an image of their father in his prime, Lindbergh, Dempsey, Keats, Santa Claus, and perhaps the white-whiskered family physician thrown in for good measure. The romantic idealists are the people who are for ever falling in and out of love, and dramatizing their lives with the false sentimentality of a bad play. The psycho¬ logical nature of “ falling in love ” deserves more minute consideration because it is so common and so generally a mistaken technique of life. It is highly improbable that people who “ fall in love at first sight ” in the accepted sense of the word, ever attain a happy love life. The vast majority of people believe that they must fall in love or be in love before they can be happy in a sexual relation. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Occasionally a man and a woman see each other for the first time, and sense a feeling of complete kinship which they call falling in love ; and, on the premise that, because love is present, all else can be attained, they marry and live happily ever after according to the time-honoured formula of the story-books. But this probably occurs with great rarity. For, as we have explained, love is the result of years of cooperation, of mutual enjoyment, and mutual suffering. It cannot then, except in the most unusual cases, be the 'premise of