The image contains the following text:
demonstrating a spurious superiority over their partner
of the opposite sex.
For one woman who believes that she is the equivalent
of a man in every sense, and lives her life as if she enjoyed
all the prerogatives of womanhood to the fullest, we can
find a dozen women who are discouraged by the pre¬
vailing patriarchal tradition, and stimulated by that
discouragement either to imitate men and masculinity to
the limits of their physiological capacity, or to demonstrate
their weakness and dependence, thus enslaving men by
their weakness and winning a sense of superiority by
undermining the dominant male, rather than by an active
attack on his prerogatives. In both cases, the masculine
woman and the clinging-vine ” woman over-rate
masculinity and under-rate femininity, the one by the
flattery of imitation, the other by the indirect flattery
of helplessness based on the alleged greater independence
and resourcefulness of the male.
Androtropism and Gynetropism
Adler has called woman’s dissatisfaction with her
feminine r6le the “ masculine protest ”, but this term is
confusing, and we propose to substitute the term andro¬
tropism,, the turning toward the masculine sex, to designate
that symptom-complex of psychological behaviour of a
woman dissatisfied with being a woman and attempting
to act “ as if ” she could become a man. Gynetropism is
the parallel term used to describe the over-valuation of the
feminine principle by the male, as we find it in certain
male homosexuals.
It is manifest that the love relationship and the marriage
bed are the logical arenas for the “ play-off ” of this age-
o d sexual competition. We may state it as a psychological
law : happiness in a love relation is impossible if the sexual
partner is being prostituted as a means of proving oneys own
superiority. The sexual athletes we have described in a
previous chapter, who enjoy their sexual relations only in
proportion to the difficulty of the conquest of their sexual