Sex efficiency through exercises : special physical culture for women / by Th. H. van de Velde ; [photos, by E. Steinemann].
26/426

5 (canvas 27)
The image contains the following text:
at present, to avoid psychological and philosophical subtle-
ties. It may, however, be confidently asserted that such
mental and emotional inhibitions are not solely due to the
influence and ideals of Christianity, as has often been
maintained both by advocates and critics. Doubtless
Nietzsche was partly, at least, justified in his denunciation
of the poisoned cup that Christianity served to Eros—for
many of the leading fathers of the Church denounced all
sexual life as shame, sin and dirt. But we must also admit
that any social order demands some degree of regulation of
the sexual activity of its members as a necessary condition
of stability, safety and even progress. Yet such necessary
regulation and limitation directly contravene urges and
impulses of elemental force, which either dominate or saturate
emotional life from childhood. This implies psychic conflict,
forcible expression or deflection or conscious dissimulation ;
and the result is a profound dishonesty in all sexual matters.
Such a state of mind fully explains the insincerity and
inaccuracy of most of us in these matters, whether to
ourselves, or—and especially—towards our fellow-men and
women, still more in any sort of publicity. At the same
time, so intricate a labyrinth is the human psyche, it is
equally certain that some degree of modesty, shame or shyness
in these matters has become fundamental and spontaneous,
at least in the white races.
Perhaps the most striking proofs of this innate and
acquired modesty are the automatic convulsive movements
with which most women who are losing consciousness—in
certain morbid states, or under anesthetics or narcotics—
endeavour to conceal their sexual organs.
Then there is the opposite emotional pole, the conscious
repeal of inhibition, which takes place in certain situations
and between certain persons ; at its unwisest and unloveliest
perhaps between certain married partners in the course of their
daily or nightly toilettes, out of sheer laziness, apathy and
gross lack of mutual consideration and individual self-respect.
Sexual modesty in itself is concerned rather with the
/mictions of the organs of sex than with the organs them-
selves. " Functional modesty" is a common human